Law Offices of Randall A. Fischer, P.A. Lawyer | Stuart | Port St. Lucie | Jupiter 772.463.7737 | 561.316.7111

Divorce Parenting Plan

The break-up of a marriage can be one of the most stressful events a person can go through.  There may be resentments, anger, depression and fear.  Attempting to handle these emotions while going through major changes in living circumstances without the assistance of legal counsel is not wise decision, especially if there are children involved.

When children are involved, divorces can get extremely tense.  The state of Florida is extremely concerned with what is in the “best interests of the child” when determining whether a parenting plan is appropriate.  Although the statutory list of factors is broad, in general, the courts believe it is in the “best interests of the child” that both parents are equally involved in the child’s life.  The Judge is afforded a lot of latitude in making this decision, but will, in general, default to a 50/50 parenting plan unless there is evidence that such an arrangement would not be in the “best interests of the child.”  The statutory factors (Florida Statute 61.13) that may otherwise alter that position are detailed below:

Determination of the best interests of the child shall be made by evaluating all of the factors affecting the welfare and interests of the particular minor child and the circumstances of that family, including, but not limited to:

(a) The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship, to honor the time-sharing schedule, and to be reasonable when changes are required.

(b) The anticipated division of parental responsibilities after the litigation, including the extent to which parental responsibilities will be delegated to third parties.

(c) The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to determine, consider, and act upon the needs of the child as opposed to the needs or desires of the parent.

(d) The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.

(e) The geographic viability of the parenting plan, with special attention paid to the needs of school-age children and the amount of time to be spent traveling to effectuate the parenting plan. This factor does not create a presumption for or against relocation of either parent with a child.

(f) The moral fitness of the parents.

(g) The mental and physical health of the parents.

(h) The home, school, and community record of the child.

(i) The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.

(j) The demonstrated knowledge, capacity, and disposition of each parent to be informed of the circumstances of the minor child, including, but not limited to, the child’s friends, teachers, medical care providers, daily activities, and favorite things.

(k) The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to provide a consistent routine for the child, such as discipline, and daily schedules for homework, meals, and bedtime.

(l) The demonstrated capacity of each parent to communicate with and keep the other parent informed of issues and activities regarding the minor child, and the willingness of each parent to adopt a unified front on all major issues when dealing with the child.

(m) Evidence of domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, regardless of whether a prior or pending action relating to those issues has been brought. If the court accepts evidence of prior or pending actions regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, the court must specifically acknowledge in writing that such evidence was considered when evaluating the best interests of the child.

(n) Evidence that either parent has knowingly provided false information to the court regarding any prior or pending action regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect.

(o) The particular parenting tasks customarily performed by each parent and the division of parental responsibilities before the institution of litigation and during the pending litigation, including the extent to which parenting responsibilities were undertaken by third parties.

(p) The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to participate and be involved in the child’s school and extracurricular activities.

(q) The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to maintain an environment for the child which is free from substance abuse.

(r) The capacity and disposition of each parent to protect the child from the ongoing litigation as demonstrated by not discussing the litigation with the child, not sharing documents or electronic media related to the litigation with the child, and refraining from disparaging comments about the other parent to the child.

(s) The developmental stages and needs of the child and the demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child’s developmental needs.

(t) Any other factor that is relevant to the determination of a specific parenting plan, including the time-sharing schedule.

Law Offices of Randall A. Fischer, P.A.

2100 SE Ocean Blvd, Ste 203 Stuart, FL 34996

United States

Randall A. Fischer, P.A.

725 SE Port St Lucie Blvd #206 Port St Lucie, FL 34984

United States

Randall A. Fischer, P.A. Law Office

1080 E Indiantown Rd #104 Jupiter, FL 33477

United States